Feed aggregator

Die Herzogin von Sussex startet ihr grosses Comeback in einer 35-Millionen-Dollar-Komödie. Nach royalen Dramen und Skandalen sieht Hollywood dies als brillanten Schachzug zur Imageaufbesserung.

Titan II ICBM - decommissioned nuclear missile - at the Titan Missile Museum, Green Valley, Sahuarita, Arizona. Credit: Stephen Cobb/Unsplash

By Naureen Hossain
UNITED NATIONS, Nov 6 2025 (IPS)

In recent days, nuclear state leaders have flouted the regulations and norms around nuclear non-proliferation and are flirting more openly with nuclear might in the name of projecting strength.

In the last week, the United States and the Russian Federation have made public shows of their nuclear messaging. On the 27th of October, President Vladimir Putin revealed a new nuclear-powered missile capable of staying airborne far longer than conventional missiles and even evading missile defense systems. Some experts have suggested that this is meant to reinforce Russia’s nuclear might, which Putin has leaned on since the start of the Ukraine invasion in February 2022.

More recently, on 29 October, President Donald Trump announced via social media that he wanted to resume nuclear testing for the first time in thirty years. In his post he wrote, “Because of other countries testing programs, I have instructed the Department of War to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis.”

As he made this announcement just before his meeting with President Xi Jinping, some experts have considered that China’s expanding nuclear arsenal has prompted some calls in Washington D.C. to quickly modernize the U.S.’s own nuclear forces. Nuclear testing by major powers like China, Russia or the U.S. has not been conducted in decades. Yet analyses have warned that such an act would only further complicate relations between this triad.

All these developments should not come as a surprise. Even as countries have been aware of the dangers of nuclear weapons since 1945, this has not completely stopped them from expanding their forces. As of June 2025, there are over 12,400 nuclear warheads in the world in only a small percentage of countries. The U.S. and Russia account for 90 percent of those warheads, both possessing more than 5,000 nuclear warheads. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), nearly all nine of the nuclear states moved to modernize their existing nuclear arsenals and acquire new missiles in 2024.

Increasing geopolitical tensions have increased feelings of uncertainty and instability, which seems to have led countries to prioritize national security. The nuclear-armed states have made moves to expand the capabilities of their arsenals. SIPRI estimates that China now owns 600 nuclear warheads. Both the United Kingdom and France have ongoing programs to develop strategic weapons, including missiles and submarines. North Korea continues to expand its military nuclear program, accelerating the production of fissile material to make more nuclear warheads.

Concerns about nuclear testing have been reflected in headlines. Credit: IPS

The threat of nuclear weapons seemed to loom over major events this year, even as their efficacy as a deterrent was thrown into question. As India and Pakistan engaged in aerial battles and strategic strikes in May, the conflict demonstrated to the world how close two nuclear powers could come to war.

Meanwhile, in the context of the ongoing war in Ukraine and the perceived threat from Russia, European nations, including France and the U.K., are moving to prioritize investments in defense, including deterrence. Germany, Denmark and Lithuania are among some of the countries that have also expressed interest in hosting nuclear weapons for the nuclear states.

William Potter, Director of the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, expressed concern over the dangers posed by nuclear weapons due to miscalculations and misperceptions at a time when “there is a total lack of trust, respect, and empathy among the nuclear weapons possessors.”

“The more nuclear weapons, the greater the risk of their inadvertent use, but even more dangerous is the absence of a political climate in which serious arms control and disarmament measures can be pursued,” Potter told IPS.

The safeguards for nuclear arms control are also being challenged. The NEW-Start treaty, the last remaining arms control treaty between the U.S. and Russia, is set to expire in February 2026, though both countries have considered voluntarily maintaining the limits on deployed strategic nuclear weapons for one year. Yet in this past week, that promise has been undercut by both parties.

At the same time, there are the continuous calls for nonproliferation and disarmament. Advocates from all over have raised awareness on the impacts of radiation on communities, on public safety and on the environment. The United Nations has platformed and rallied these advocates and has raised the alarm for disarmament since its official beginning on 24 October, 1945.

Amidst this, there is the fear of a new nuclear arms race. During the high-level meeting on the elimination of nuclear weapons in September this year, the UN’s Chef de Cabinet Courtenay Rattray, who delivered remarks on behalf of Secretary-General António Guterres, said that the world was “sleepwalking” into this new arms race, now defined by new technologies and new domains for conflict such as cyberspace. Rattney warned that “the risks of escalation and miscalculation are multiplying.”

So if the nuclear states are modernizing their arsenals, how do modern technologies fit in? Artificial intelligence (AI) is the latest frontier that countries are navigating and investing significant resources in to achieve progress. Given that, national and global regulations on the safe governance of AI are still nascent as countries still work to agree on universal agreements for the frameworks for the ethical applications of AI.

As it becomes increasingly sophisticated and more accessible, member states have been investing resources into incorporating AI in the military domain. Given that it does not fit neatly into pre-existing deterrence frameworks, this has also raised concerns over AI’s possible “destabilizing effects,” according to Wilfred Wan, Director of the SIPRI Weapons of Mass Destruction Programme.

It has prompted stakeholders to engage in serious negotiations on AI governance in the military domain, including guardrails to reduce the risk of escalation, Wan told IPS. At the multilateral level, he cites the example of the Blueprint for Action that came out of the second summit on Responsible AI in the Military Domain (REAIM) in 2024. It is a non-binding agreement among 61 countries, including nuclear powers like the U.S., the U.K., France and Pakistan, that provides a framework for the responsibility that parties need to take in integrating AI, and recognizing gaps that policymakers must take into account. There is also the UN General Assembly Resolution 79/239 on “[AI] in the military domain and its implications for international peace and security.”

“This is certainly not a substitute for disarmament progress, but in the current strategic context, it can help rebuild some of the trust and confidence necessary for revitalizing those efforts,” Wan said.

Researchers from SIPRI have found there are no governance frameworks specifically for the nuclear-AI nexus compared to those for conventional military systems. “In the nuclear context, discussions have largely centered on retaining human control in nuclear decision-making. This is an essential principle but does not address other ways in which AI integration can affect the environment in which nuclear decisions are made, directly or indirectly,” Wan explained.

“Absent a framework that addresses these aspects, including through regulatory and technical measures, there remains the risk of accelerated integration of AI among nuclear-armed states in a manner that destabilizes the security environment, threatens strategic stability, and impacts the risk of nuclear use.”

When assessing the existing approaches to the governance of military AI, it shows common areas of concern, such as raising awareness through multi-stakeholder engagement and preserving the capacity for human intervention, along with applying safety and security measures to mitigate escalation risks.

At this time, nuclear disarmament and nonproliferation are critical and may even provide insight into negotiating the governance of AI in nuclear forces. The approaches to fostering multi-stakeholder dialogue that include policymakers, non-nuclear states, experts and the private sector could similarly apply to discussions around AI in nuclear forces. Though it should be noted that their limited knowledge of nuclear force structures may constrain meaningful contributions to the debate. Nevertheless, their participation must be facilitated if nuclear parties truly value human control in this factor.

Nuclear and non-nuclear states must recommit to the anti-nuclear agreements, including the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, and the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. Potter stressed the importance of disarmament and nonproliferation education, particularly to empower future generations to “pursue creative ways to reduce pressing nuclear dangers.”

The UN can employ its influence in advancing disarmament efforts through dialogue and awareness efforts from the General Assembly and the Office of Disarmament Affairs (UN-ODA). The UN has also confirmed it will convene an independent scientific panel to assess the effects of nuclear warfare and an Expert Group on Nuclear-Free War Zones.

“Nuclear disarmament is more important today than ever before, but it is not simply a question of securing lower numbers of nuclear weapons,” Potter said. “At a time when the “nuclear taboo” has been eroded and discussions about the use of nuclear weapons have been normalized, it is vital that policymakers act boldly in a fashion commensurate with the threat.”

IPS UN Bureau Report

 

Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs');  

Note: This article is brought to you by IPS Noram in collaboration with INPS Japan and Soka Gakkai International in consultative status with ECOSOC.

Related Articles

• US Threatens to Resume Nuclear Testing while Past Tests Have Devastated Victims Worldwide
• Breaking the Silence in Tokyo: A Kazakh Filmmaker Confronts the Nuclear Scars Through Her Documentary “Jara”

Seit Mittwoch läuft das Verfahren am Supreme Court in den USA, ob Trumps Strafzölle gegen andere Länder rechtens sind. Im Gerichtssaal weht dem US-Präsidenten ein eisiger Wind entgegen – auch von der konservativen Seite.

Elfogyott a pénz a roma polgárőrségek fenntartásának támogatására, a beruházási minisztérium pedig ezt nem tudja dotálni a saját költségvetéséből – jelentette ki Samuel Migaľ (független) beruházási-, régiófejlesztési- és informatizációs miniszter.

Fico aggódik az oroszok vagyonáért, de Sátor Balázs szerint az Európai Uniónak joga van az orosz vagyonokat Ukrajna újjáépítésének fedezetéül használni. A szakértő Cúth Csabával beszélgetve latolgatta Orbán Viktor washingtoni útjának céljait és értékelte a kínai–amerikai megállapodást és a pokrovszki fronthelyzetet is.

First informal talks ended early amid deep divisions

Most of the incidents were threats or attacks via social media, a new report shows

Das Bundesgericht hat entschieden: Ein Arzt aus dem Kanton Schwyz verliert wegen Verurteilung wegen Sexualdelikten seine Berufsbewilligung. Er darf nur noch unter Aufsicht arbeiten, da seine Vertrauenswürdigkeit infrage steht.

Un professeur décrit Mamdani comme "l'un des nôtres", tandis que certains jeunes Ougandais s'inspirent de la victoire de cet homme de 34 ans.

Un professeur décrit Mamdani comme "l'un des nôtres", tandis que certains jeunes Ougandais s'inspirent de la victoire de cet homme de 34 ans.

Frische Luft von aussen tut Wohnräumen gut und beugt Schimmelbildung vor. Aber auch für uns Menschen ist regelmässiges Lüften wichtig, denn in stickigen Räumen wird man schneller müde. Zu jeder Jahreszeit sollte mehrmals am Tag gelüftet werden.

L’Office National de Météorologie (ONM) vient d’émettre un Bulletin Météorologique Spécial (BMS) de niveau de vigilance « Orange« , annonçant un week-end marqué par des intempéries pour […]

L’article Alerte météo (BMS) : Fortes pluies et orages sur 10 wilayas à partir de ce jeudi soir est apparu en premier sur .

24.hu: Orbán Viktor magyar kormányfő és delegációja csütörtökön )11. 6.) 8:34 órakor szállt fel a Wizz Air gépével a Liszt Ferenc Nemzeti Repülőtérről, de kellett egy kitérőt tenniük. A Világgazdaság információi szerint 11:36 óra körül máris landolt a repülő az izlandi Keflavík Nemzetközi Repülőtéren. Úgy tudják, erre biztonsági előírások miatt volt szükség.

Heftige Unwetter treffen Spanien: Katalonien und Galicien in höchster Alarmstufe. Starkregen führt zu Flugausfällen in Barcelona und Überschwemmungen.

Ski-Talent Lenz Hächler ist offiziell vergeben. Der Zuger zeigt sich auf Instagram erstmals mit seiner Freundin Isabelle Lötscher. Das Paar geniesst aktuell die letzten Sonnentage vor der Wettkampfsaison.

Budget chief Piotr Serafin did not confirm whether revisions would follow before Parliament’s ultimatum next Wednesday

The attack comes amid a resurgence of piracy in the region in recent days.

Le Royaume-Uni a peut-être quitté l’Union européenne, mais les répercussions juridiques du Brexit continuent de se faire sentir dans l’UE. Mercredi 5 novembre, un tribunal pénal belge a condamné deux ressortissants polonais, dont un assistant parlementaire actuel, pour détournement de fonds européens liés à des entités politiques associées à Nigel Farage et à son parti, le UKIP.

The post La justice belge condamne deux personnes pour détournement de fonds européens liés au groupe pro-Brexit de Nigel Farage appeared first on Euractiv FR.

Ein Antrag ist im Parlament eingegangen, wonach die Immunität von FDP-Nationalrat Simon Michel aufgehoben werden soll. Damit die Staatsanwaltschaft Solothurn gegen den Politiker ermitteln kann, muss sie dieses Gesuch stellen. Es geht um eine Anzeige wegen Ehrverletzung.