La Direction Générale des Impôts (DGI) a modifié sa plateforme de demande de quitus fiscal après une rencontre avec le parti politique "Les Démocrates". La demande d'audience formulée par le parti le 16 septembre a conduit à une réunion, mercredi 17 septembre, à 18 heures, à la DGI.
Le principal sujet abordé concernait la procédure imposant aux candidats de spécifier le type d'élection auquel ils participent avant de soumettre leur demande de quitus fiscal. Cette obligation avait suscité des interrogations.
La DGI a expliqué qu'elle avait mis en place ce paramétrage pour traiter les demandes par ordre de priorité. En effet, les dates de dépôt des dossiers auprès de la Commission Electorale Nationale Autonome (CENA) varient en fonction des élections, ce qui nécessite un traitement différencié des demandes.
À l'issue de la rencontre, et après consultation des autorités de la CENA, il a été décidé de revoir cette configuration. En conséquence, la DGI a déployé une nouvelle version de la plateforme dès le 17 septembre 2025, ajustant le processus afin de mieux répondre aux attentes des utilisateurs.
Ce réajustement intervient quelques jours après le lancement de la plateforme, un outil devenu indispensable pour les candidats aux élections.
M. M.
À un mois des élections législatives, la question d’une nouvelle taxe européenne sur les carburants automobiles et les combustibles de chauffage est devenue un enjeu central de la campagne électorale en République tchèque.
The post En République tchèque, les quotas d’émissions de carbone de l’UE s’invitent dans la campagne électorale appeared first on Euractiv FR.
Les ambassadeurs de l’UE ont donné leur feu vert, mercredi 17 septembre, à la Commission européenne pour qu'elle lance des négociations avec le Royaume-Uni et le Canada sur la participation de leurs fabricants d’armement au nouveau programme de prêts SAFE de l’Union pour le financement de la défense.
The post Feu vert pour l’ouverture des négociations sur l’adhésion de Londres et Ottawa au programme de prêts pour la défense SAFE appeared first on Euractiv FR.
Choisissez votre style. Votre stratégie idéale. Votre propre rythme. Sans barrières. Sans conditions compliquées. Sans scénarios imposés. Paris pour tous. Révélez-vous ! sur 1xBet, c'est simple : chacun peut interagir avec le sport et les jeux à sa guise, quels que soient son sexe, sa profession, son expérience, son budget ou son emploi du temps. La plateforme s'adapte à chacun, et non l'inverse. L'accent est mis sur la commodité, le choix et le respect du rythme personnel.
Pour la marque 1xBet, ce n'est pas seulement un slogan, mais un principe qui s'applique au niveau du service. Formats, horaires, style : tout dépend de l'utilisateur, pas des règles.
Ouverture pour tous
Femmes et hommes, débutants et expérimentés : chacun trouve son style sur la plateforme. L'interface est claire, l'inscription ne prend que quelques secondes et la structure du site est simple. La communication est concise et conviviale. De plus, un bonus de bienvenue sur le premier dépôt est offert à tous les nouveaux joueurs : 200 % jusqu'à 250 000 XOF.
Un principe simple fonctionne ici : l'accessibilité sans barrières. L'équipe 1xBet souligne que le jeu ne doit pas nécessairement être exceptionnel ou festif : il peut s'intégrer à une journée ordinaire, comme la consultation des résultats ou une courte pause-café. L'essentiel est que chacun puisse choisir un format pratique et interagir avec la plateforme à sa manière.
C'est l'essence même du concept de « paris pour tous » : lorsque personne ne s'adapte au jeu, mais que celui-ci s'adapte avec flexibilité à différents scénarios de vie.
La plateforme est adaptée à des personnes ayant des routines très différentes.
Le coursier peut consulter les résultats entre différentes adresses, faire un pari simple lors d'une courte pause et discuter du match avec ses amis le soir.
Après son service, le mécanicien de la station-service consulte le planning et concocte un accumulateur pour le week-end : pour lui, c'est une façon de soutenir ses équipes préférées.
Une vendeuse dans un café ouvre l'application mobile entre deux commandes et parie sur le match de l'équipe féminine.
Après l'essayage, la créatrice-couturière opte pour des machines à sous au style familier : c'est sa manière de faire une pause et de se recharger.
Chacun de ces exemples a son propre rythme, son propre moment, son propre style. La plateforme ne nécessite aucune formation ni condition particulière : elle est conçue pour différents joueurs, quels que soient leur profession, leur budget ou leur expérience.
Le confort réside dans les détails
Paris sportifs ou jeux de casino : chacun peut choisir la solution adaptée à son humeur ou à sa situation.
La version (mobile, de bureau ou application) peut être choisie selon ses préférences.
Les fonctionnalités sont transparentes, compréhensibles et adaptées à un usage quotidien. Tout fonctionne rapidement, l'interface est intuitive et sans étapes supplémentaires.
Parmi les avantages : un large choix d'événements, des cotes élevées, des systèmes de paiement pratiques, un support technique attentionné, ainsi que diverses offres de bonus, permanentes et saisonnières, ainsi que des promotions, concours, tirages au sort et autres surprises fréquentes de 1xBet.
De nombreux formats sont disponibles : chacun y trouvera son bonheur. Tout cela contribue à intégrer la plateforme 1xBet et les paris à votre quotidien, sans stress inutile.
Paris pour tous. Révélez-vous ! C'est une question de choix
L'utilisateur décide lui-même comment, quand et pourquoi il interagit avec le jeu. La plateforme 1xBet crée un espace où le confort d'utilisation prime : accessibilité, solutions simples, interfaces claires. Ici, chacun trouve son propre rythme, et le jeu s'intègre à son style.
Le Programme des Nations unies pour le développement (PNUD), en partenariat avec les gouvernements du Bénin, du Burkina Faso, de la Côte d'Ivoire, du Ghana et du Togo, organise à Cotonou un Dialogue régional sur les architectures de paix, les 18 et 19 septembre 2025.
La rencontre de Cotonou représente une étape clé pour « renforcer la paix, la stabilité et la résilience » , « face à la montée des menaces transnationales dans le Golfe de Guinée », selon un communiqué du PNUD.
Les chiffres donnent la mesure des défis. Selon l'Indice mondial du terrorisme 2025, le Sahel a concentré 51 % des décès dus au terrorisme en 2024, soit deux fois plus qu'en 2019. À cela s'ajoutent plus de 4,3 millions de personnes déplacées de force, des tensions socio-économiques croissantes, la pauvreté, le chômage des jeunes et les inégalités.
Pour le Golfe de Guinée, les menaces s'accumulent : expansion des groupes extrémistes depuis le Sahel, prolifération des marchés illicites, déplacements forcés et effets du changement climatique. Ces dynamiques fragilisent les communautés locales et mettent à l'épreuve les mécanismes nationaux de paix, « souvent isolés et sous-financés », note encore le communiqué.
Responsables gouvernementaux, experts régionaux, universitaires, représentants de la société civile, leaders communautaires et religieux, ainsi que des groupes de femmes et de jeunes prendront part aux échanges. Le dialogue vise à « promouvoir l'engagement (…) à collaborer dans le sens d'une réponse collective et intégrée pour prévenir les conflits et renforcer la stabilité régionale ».
Ce dialogue s'inscrit dans le cadre de la Facilité de prévention pour le Golfe de Guinée, soutenue par le PNUD et des partenaires tels que le Japon, le Danemark, le Luxembourg et la Corée du Sud. L'initiative vise à renforcer les réponses régionales aux défis de l'extrémisme violent, de la criminalité transnationale organisée, de la piraterie maritime et des trafics illicites.
Vers une feuille de route commune
Au terme des deux jours de travaux, les participants devront aboutir à une compréhension partagée des défis, à des recommandations concrètes pour améliorer les mécanismes d'alerte précoce et à « un projet de feuille de route régionale pour la paix durable et le développement en Afrique de l'Ouest ».
The opening session of the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, China, 4 September 1995. UN Photo/Milton Grant. The UN marks 30 years since its members adopted the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action.
By S. Mona Sinha
NEW YORK, Sep 18 2025 (IPS)
On Monday, three decades on from the historic Fourth World Conference on Women, the General Assembly meets to discuss recommitting to, resourcing, and accelerating the implementation of the 1995 Beijing Platform for Action – an historic agreement which mapped the path to achieving gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls.
This is a critical moment because, despite the considerable progress that’s been made, it is a sobering fact that not a single country has yet fully delivered against those aims. And with reactionary attitudes increasingly to the fore, many of these hard-won gains are, alarmingly, under threat of reversal.
Even where the heart is willing, the slow pace or absence of change is more often than not put down to budgetary or political barriers. Gender equality is important, just not important enough. We have other problems to fix. We’ll get back to it.
But this is incredibly short-sighted.
While achieving gender equality is first and foremost a matter of human rights, it is also one of the surest ways to help address those other problems, leading to more prosperous economies, more resilient communities, and more sustainable, peaceful societies.
This is not just a matter of opinion. The evidence is clear.
Closing gender gaps in education, employment and pay would unleash an unprecedented wave of productivity. In 2015, McKinsey Global Institute (MGI) estimated that equal participation of women in the workforce could add up to $12 trillion to global GDP within 10 years.
That’s more than the economies of Japan, Germany and the UK combined and would have already been achieved if we had acted on it in 2015.
The logic is simple: excluding half of the population from opportunities to explore and achieve their full potential is an extraordinary waste. When women are able to contribute equally, innovation flourishes, productivity rises and household incomes grow. Far from being a drag on resources, equality is a growth multiplier.
Moreover, women’s earnings are more likely to be invested in children’s health, nutrition, and education, breaking intergenerational cycles of poverty. And in agriculture, where women make up nearly half the global workforce, the FAO estimates equal access to resources could boost crop yields by up to 30% and reduce the number of hungry people by more than 100 million.
Perhaps for these reasons, research has shown that the treatment of women is one of the strongest predictors of whether a country is peaceful. Where women’s rights are respected, societies are more stable, less prone to conflict, and more open to cooperation.
Women’s participation in peace processes matters too. Agreements brokered with women at the table are more durable, more inclusive, and more likely to succeed. We have the proof of that as well.
And then there’s the environment. Women and girls, especially in developing countries, are disproportionately affected by climate change. But it’s also true that when included in decision-making, they bring difference-making knowledge and perspectives to the table.
Indeed, a 2019 study in Global Environmental Change showed that countries with more women in parliament adopt more ambitious climate policies and have lower carbon emissions.
Meanwhile, women-led community programmes in forestry and water management have consistently delivered stronger conservation outcomes. In other words, tackling the climate crisis is not only about technology and finance – it’s also about representation.
Taken together, it’s clear that equality drives prosperity, resilience, peace and sustainability. To deny women equal rights and opportunities is not simply unjust, it’s an act of societal self-sabotage.
At Equality Now, we lead the way in driving the legal and systemic change needed to realise this vision of a just and better world. Since our inception in 1992 we have worked with governments, legal bodies, civil society and other partners to help reform 130 discriminatory laws, improving the lives of millions of women and girls, their communities and nations, both now and for generations to come.
We were in Beijing in 1995, and we’ll be in New York this week – where to all in attendance our message is clear:
The world cannot afford to wait. Everyone needs equality now.
S. Mona Sinha is Global Executive Director, Equality Now
IPS UN Bureau
Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
By Thalif Deen
UNITED NATIONS, Sep 18 2025 (IPS)
When the high-level meeting of the General Assembly takes place, September 22-30—with over 150 world political leaders in town–the UN will be in a locked down mode with extra tight security.
With a rash of threats and political killings in the US—including an attempted assassination of Donald Trump when he was campaigning for the US presidency in July 2024– the list continues.
Against the backdrop of the killing of a conservative activist Charlie Kirk last week, plus the fire-bombing in early 2025, of the residence of Governor Josh Shapiro in Pennsylvania, and the killings of Minnesota state lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband– the UN is predictably taking extra precautionary measures.
Asked at a press conference September 15 about security in the wake of recent events in the United States, UN Spokesperson Stephane Dujarric told reporters: “The security within the UN complex during the General Assembly sessions is as tight, as it can be”.
“We are obviously in close contact with the host country authorities, the US Secret Service, the State Department, and, of course, the NYPD (New York Police Department). They will take the measures they need to take outside”.
Traditionally, diplomats and delegates, do not undergo security checks or walk through metal detectors inside the UN building.
Asked whether there will be new restrictions this year, Dujarric said: “I don’t know”.
The limits on the movements of accredited journalists during the high-level meetings were spelled out September 17 by the UN’s Media Accreditation and Liaison Unit (MALU). The link follows:
https://www.un.org/en/media/accreditation/unga.shtml
Accredited media representatives, including official photographers and videographers, must be escorted by Media Accreditation and Liaison Unit staff at all times in the restricted areas, including the Conference Building and General Assembly Building.
Media pass holders are NOT permitted on the second floor of the Conference Building or General Assembly Building.
But going down memory lane, there were several lapses in security in a bygone era, resulting in a bazooka terrorist attack against the Secretariat building back in 1964—and the only such attack in the history of the UN.
But last year, the UN security, conscious on the high-tech weapons now deployed in military conflicts, had a sign outside the building declaring the UN a “NO DRONE ZONE.”
Ernesto “Che” Guevara, Minister of Industries of Cuba, addresses the General Assembly on Dec. 11, 1964. Credit: UN Photo/TC
The streets next week – as in previous years — will be littered with scores of police officers, US Secret Service personnel, UN security officers, the New York Police Department (NYPD), bomb-sniffing dogs, road closures — and a stand-by ambulance in the UN campus ready to cope with any medical emergencies.
In previous years, the Secret Service also had an official chaplain ready to perform last rites in case of any political assassinations in the UN premises.
Meanwhile, hundreds of UN staffers and journalists are double and triple-checked for their photo IDs, reminiscent of security at the Pentagon and the CIA headquarters (where a visitor ID is geared to automatically change colour, if you overstay your visit).
Still, back in 1964, perhaps with relatively less security, the UN building came under a terrorist attack — perhaps for the first time in the history of the world body — from a mis-guided rocket launcher.
When the politically-charismatic Ernesto Che Guevara, once second-in-command to Cuban leader Fidel Castro, was at the United Nations to address the General Assembly sessions in 1964, the U.N. headquarters came under fire – literally.
The speech by the Argentine-born Marxist revolutionary was momentarily drowned by the sound of an explosion.
The anti-Castro forces in the United States, backed by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), had mounted an insidious campaign to stop Che Guevara from speaking.
A 3.5-inch bazooka was fired at the 39-storeyed Secretariat building by the East River while a boisterous anti-Castro, anti-Che Guevara demonstration was taking place outside the UN building.
According to Wikipedia, the bazooka is the common name for a man-portable recoilless anti-tank rocket launcher, widely deployed by the US army, especially during World War II.
But the rocket launcher – which was apparently not as sophisticated as today’s shoulder-fired missiles and rocket-propelled grenades – missed its target, rattled windows, and fell into the river about 200 yards from the building.
One newspaper report described the attack as “one of the wildest episodes since the United Nations moved into its East River headquarters in 1952.”
As longtime U.N. staffers would recall, the failed bombing of the U.N. building took place when Che Guevara launched a blistering attack on U.S. foreign policy and denounced a proposed de-nuclearization pact for the Western hemisphere.
After his Assembly speech, Che Guevara was asked about the attack aimed at him. “The explosion has given the whole thing more flavor,” he joked, as he chomped on his Cuban cigar, during a press conference.
When he was told by a reporter that the New York City police had nabbed a woman, described as an anti-Castro Cuban exile, who had pulled out a hunting knife and jumped over the UN wall, intending to kill him, Che Guevara said: “It is better to be killed by a woman with a knife than by a man with a gun.”
A security officer once recalled an incident where the prime minister from an African country, addressing the General Assembly, was heckled by a group of African students.
As is usual with hecklers, the boisterous group was taken off the visitor’s gallery, grilled, photographer and banned from entering the UN premises.
But about five years later, one of the hecklers returned to the UN —this time, as foreign minister of his country, and addressed the world body.
Meanwhile, Sri Lanka’s Foreign Minister ACS Hameed had one of his memorable moments when Krishna Vaikunthavasan, a London-based lawyer, campaigning for a separate Tamil state, surreptitiously gate-crashed into the UN and tried to upstage Hameed by walking onto the podium of the General Assembly hall and momentarily took the speaker’s slot—at a time when security was lax.
The incident, perhaps a rarity in the history of the UN, saw the intruder unleashing a diatribe against a member state accusing it of genocide and lambasting the government for committing war crimes against the Tamils fighting for a separate state in northern Sri Lanka.
When the president of the Assembly realized he had an interloper on his hands, he cut off the mike and summoned security guards who bodily ejected him from the hall and banned him from the UN premises. And as Hameed walked up to the podium, there was pin drop silence in the Assembly Hall.
As a member of the Sri Lanka delegation at that time, I was seated behind Hameed. But the unflappable Hameed, unprompted by any of his delegates, produced a riveting punchline: “Mr President”, he said “I want to thank the previous speaker for keeping his speech short,” he said, as the Assembly, known to suffer longwinded speeches, broke into peals of laughter.
The intruder was in effect upstaged by the Foreign Minister.
This article includes excerpts from a book on the United Nations titled “No Comment – and Don’t Quote Me on That” authored by Thalif Deen and available on Amazon. The link to Amazon via the author’s website follows: https://www.rodericgrigson.com/no-comment-by-thalif-deen/
IPS UN Bureau Report
Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
Banner headlines and flawed interpretations of Nepal's protests have characterized media coverage. Graphic: IPS
By Diwash Gahatraj and Chandrani Sinha
KATHMANDU & NEW DELHI, Sep 18 2025 (IPS)
Claims that Ravi Laxmi Chitrakar, wife of former Nepali Prime Minister Jhala Nath Khanal, was burned alive in her home—fake. The reports of an angry mob destroying and vandalizing the Pashupatinath Temple—fake. Allegations that protesters were demanding a Hindu nation in Nepal—fake. As Kathmandu and other Nepali cities erupted in unrest last week, the fire of fake news spread just as fiercely across Nepal and into neighboring India and the rest of the world.
These sensational claims, widely circulated during Nepal’s recent unrest, proved to be misinformation. Driven by various actors and amplified by sections of Indian and international media, the stories dominated headlines, prime-time debates, and viral reels on Instagram, TikTok, and other platforms—framing the movement as a “Gen Z protest” over a social media ban.
In reality, Nepal’s youth were rallying against something far deeper: decades of entrenched corruption and a demand for genuine accountability from those in power.
On a sunny September morning, Nepal’s Generation Z poured into the streets of Kathmandu in what would become the country’s most significant youth uprising in decades. What began as peaceful demonstrations demanding jobs, government accountability, and digital freedoms soon swelled into a nationwide revolt that ultimately toppled Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli. The protests turned deadly on September 8, 2025, when police opened fire on demonstrators, killing at least 19 people on the first day alone, with hundreds more injured. The unrest spread rapidly from Kathmandu to major cities, including Pokhara, Biratnagar, Butwal, Bhairahawa, and Bharatpur, as young Nepalis rallied against corruption and a sweeping social media ban.
The crisis reached its peak when protesters stormed and set fire to the parliament building, forcing Oli’s resignation and prompting the military to take control of the streets. The political upheaval culminated in the appointment of Nepal’s first female prime minister, former Chief Justice Sushila Karki, as interim leader.
As the dust settles on one of South Asia’s most dramatic youth-led revolutions, the full extent of the casualties and destruction across Nepal continues to emerge, with the latest reports indicating at least 72 deaths and at least 2,113 injured nationwide.
Flames engulf the Nepal Supreme Court building in Kathmandu. Credit: Barsha Shah/IPS
Chaos of Misinformation
Amid the swirl of rumors and misinformation during the protests, one story that shocked the people was that of Ravi Laxmi Chitrakar, wife of former Prime Minister Jhala Nath Khanal. News started circulating that she was burnt to death inside her house. The false report spread fast, picked up by big YouTubers like Dhruv Rathee and even reported by the Indian daily Times of India, amplifying the claim to millions. “In reality, she had suffered serious burn injuries during an attack and was taken to Kirtipur Burn Hospital in critical condition—but she is alive,” said Rohit Dahal, a Gen Z member and close observer of the movement.
Later, Indian fact-checking outlet Alt News published a story debunking the misinformation.
Initially, many media outlets reshaped the protest’s narrative, reducing it to a youth backlash against the social media ban. Kathmandu-based freelance journalist, researcher and fact-checker Deepak Adhikari says the movement started with young people sharing videos contrasting the lavish lifestyles of politicians’ children, also called ‘Nepo Kids,’ with the daily struggles of ordinary citizens but soon became a major flashpoint for misinformation.
“The most common falsehoods were claims of attacks on politicians and their properties and rumors that leaders were fleeing the country. While some of this misleading content originated on Nepali social media, Indian television channels and users amplified it, turning it into a much bigger problem,” says Adhikari, who heads Nepal Check, a fact-checking platform dedicated to exposing misinformation and protecting public discourse.
Adhikari adds that unfounded claims about sacred sites also went viral. On September 9, a Facebook page called Corporate Bazaar posted a video claiming protesters had reached Pashupatinath Temple and attempted vandalism. The clip showed people climbing the temple gate—but a fact-check later revealed it was originally uploaded nearly two months earlier by a TikTok user during the Vatsaleshwori Jatra festival. YouTubers also amplified such rumors, Adhikari shares. For instance, a U.S.-based Nepali creator, Tanka Dahal, claimed police had detained 32 children inside Nepal’s parliament, fueling even more dramatic—and false—claims that the children had been killed there.
Indian Inputs
As Nepal’s youth fought for their future, Indian broadcasters and social media influencers reframed the movement. Dainik Jagaran, a popular news outlet, ran a front-page story claiming the Gen Z protests were demanding a Hindu Rashtra. This became a clear example of how misinformation can hijack a movement. While Nepal has seen pro-monarchy demonstrations in the past, calling for the reversal of the country’s secular status, the current protests did not include such demands. Instead, the Gen Z movement focused on highlighting the country’s stark wealth gap, rampant nepotism, and a migration crisis that forces nearly one in 10 Nepalis to work abroad. Politicians’ children flaunt luxury while most citizens struggle to make ends meet.
Asked how Indian media and social media users amplified false narratives about Nepal’s protests, BOOM Live deputy editor Karen Rebelo explained that large-scale anti-government movements often attract misinformation, especially when they draw attention beyond national borders.
“Misinformation thrives on uncertainty. In the vacuum created by incomplete reporting, people either invent stories or recycle old information to go viral,” she said.
Rebelo noted that social media determines who controls the narrative—authorities, protesters, or other actors. In Nepal’s case, many Indian outlets misreported the protests as solely a reaction to the social media ban. In reality, Gen Z demonstrators were protesting systemic corruption, nepotism, and inequality, with the ban only highlighting deeper frustrations.
Rebelo also pointed out how some right-wing outlets framed the protests as efforts to restore the monarchy or establish a Hindu nation—narratives that misrepresented the genuine concerns of Nepali youth. “These stories were amplified online and distorted what was actually happening on the ground,” she said.
Similarly, one of the crucial groups part of the Gen Z protest is Hami Nepal, a non-profit dedicated to supporting communities and individuals in need. According to the Nepal Times, “The group played a central role in guiding the demonstrations, using its Instagram and Discord platforms to circulate protest information and share guidelines.
Interestingly, the group’s leader, Sudan Gurung, became another victim of misinformation. As Nepal’s Gen Z protests gained momentum, misinformation quickly complicated the story. Upendra Mani Pradhan, a journalist and political analyst based in Darjeeling and editor-at-large at The Darjeeling Chronicle, pointed to this case.
“A major gaffe that almost painted the Gen Z revolution as ‘India-sponsored was the case of Sudan Gurung,” Pradhan said. He explained that Indian news channels—News18 and Zee News—published photos of Sudhan Gurung from Darjeeling, claiming he was a key architect of the Gen Z movement and leader of the Hami Nepal group. “The problem was both outlets, perhaps in their rush to report, failed to do their due diligence. They typed ‘Sudhan Gurung activist’ and not ‘Sudan Gurung, Nepal’ and used the first image they found online,” Pradhan said.
Coincidentally, Sudhan Gurung from Darjeeling is also an anti-corruption activist. He was assaulted a month earlier, allegedly by political goons in the Darjeeling hills of India, for exposing the Teachers’ Recruitment scam in the Gorkhaland Territorial Administration.
Newspaper The Telegraph, published from Kolkata, wrote about this confusion and the backlash faced by the Nepali Sudan, with many questioning his credibility.
Tensions over media coverage of the protests spilled into a visible backlash against Indian journalists. On September 11, an Indian reporter was reportedly manhandled by protesters chanting anti-India slogans.
“It is very unfortunate that the journalist had to face this,” says Rebelo. “But this backlash did not come out of nowhere. Reckless reporting and misinformation by some Indian media outlets created the anger. We could have covered the story with much more care and responsibility.”
Rebelo highlighted a deeper issue, saying the incident reflects how little many in India understand their neighboring countries. “This lack of nuance makes misinformation even more damaging,” she added, noting that sensational reporting often worsens the situation.
IPS UN Bureau Report
Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
Excerpt:
Driven by various actors and amplified by sections of Indian and international media, the Nepal protest stories dominated headlines, prime-time debates, and viral reels on Instagram, TikTok, and other platforms—framing the movement as a “Gen Z protest” over a social media ban. In reality, Nepal’s youth were rallying against something far deeper: decades of entrenched corruption and a demand for genuine accountability from those in power.Un camion chargé de sable a fini sa course dans un caniveau dans la soirée de mercredi 17 septembre 2025, à Lissezoun Dakpa, dans la commune de Bohicon,
Plus de peur que de mal après l'accident d'un camion chargé de sable à Bohicon ce mercredi 17 septembre 2025. Le véhicule en provenance de Djidja s'est renversé dans un caniveau à Lissezoun Dakpa. Le chauffeur selon les témoins, tentait de négocier un virage quand l'un des pneus avant s'est éclaté. Il perd alors le contrôle et percute une balise qui le fait basculer dans le caniveau. Outre les dégâts matériels, aucune perte en vie humaine ni de blessé n'ont été enregistrés.
F. A. A.